Uzodimma of Imo State has signed into law, the Imo State Administration of
Criminal bill N02, 2020 (ISACJL, 2020), which gives him the power to arrest and
detain residents of the state for long as is his wish.
documents accessed by our correspondent, anybody detained on the orders of
Uzodimma can only be granted bail on the governor’s consent.
The bill also
abolishes all forms of preliminary investigation into a criminal charge by a
magistrate or any court in the state, replacing them with preparation of proof
“Chapter 38 (section 484 to 485) deals with detention during governor’s pleasure.
“Section 484 of the ISACJL, 2020 provides that where any person is ordered to be detained during the governor’s pleasure, he shall notwithstanding anything in the ISACJL, 2020 or contained in any other written law liable to be detained in such place and under such conditions as the governor may direct and whilst so detained shall be in proper custody.
“Section 485(1) of ISACJL, 2020 enacts that a person detained during the governor’s pleasure may at any time be discharged by the governor on license which said license may be in such form and in such conditions as the governor may direct under section 485(2).
“Finally, in section 485(3) of the ISACJL, 2020 a license may at any time be revoked or varied by the governor and where license has been revoked, the person to whom the person the license relates shall proceed to such place as the governor may direct and if he fails to do so, may be arrested without warrant and taken to such place.”
On the matter, a
political analyst, Akwarandu Izuchukwu, said to journalists, “The law for
me is draconian and sets a bad precedence. It also contradicts the constitution
of the Federal Republic.
“There is suspicion also that the law is targeted at vocal opposition voices and activists in the state who have been tormented in several ways since the inception of Uzodinma administration.
“That very S.484 was smuggled into that law. It wasn’t in the original draft. Ouster clause provisions are not only anarchronistic but undemocratic. The government should send it back to the House of Assembly for amendment of that provision.”